February 2023
State Senator Nancy Skinner
The problem is not necessarily lack of housing, but lack of affordable housing
Another complicated issue
There is a shortage of units in the Bay area, including Berkeley and Oakland.
A good amount of it is market rate and very unaffordable; neighbors often oppose affordable housing.
On questions of landlords who keep apartments vacant – Ellis Act and Costa Hawkins – the purpose was to undermine rent control; proposed tax on vacant units failed Berkeley ballot – may have needed a vote, couldn’t just enact law in Berkeley.
Cities can send testers to look at apartments to enforce acceptance of section 8 vouchers and rent to minorities, but they generally don’t enforce laws and regulations.
Not sure whether we can give statewide incentives to help landlords rent to section 8 tenants; we did this in LA with some success, so incentives are worth exploring as a statewide option.
Fed government doesn’t fund housing anymore since Reagan. Last 2-3 years we have put more money into subsidizing affordable housing than we have in eons. Housing is developed by market rate investors. So, incentivize affordable units mixed in with market rate units; cities have to allow market rate developers to include 20% affordable units.
Takes longer for non-profit developers to build affordable than market rate.
Have put forward bills to limit the amount of time w/hearing, etc. that it takes to build affordable housing.
Eden Housing, Resources for Community Housing = some organizations helping with housing solutions
For commercial properties, people are now mostly purchasing online, not in brick/mortar shops. The share of online purchases keeps increasing. Stores are closing because of this, even the large box stores
HHAP, Homeless Housing Assistance Program – for very affordable housing for the portion of the unhoused population that needs full support. This is a small part of the unhoused population. Governor wanted more accountability, met with mayors in December; realized that certain details the state required of the cities were so onerous that they weren’t effective. Now trying to figure out how to change the requirements
As an example: BART received $350k to deal with homeless on transit and gave a contract to the Salvation Army, but the Salvation Army has a policy of complete abstinence. Such a policy is not appropriate for this part of the population. So, the contract served just one person!
Trying to look at how to restructure funding sources to make clearer and get best results – funding is for purchase money.
HomeKey program has had success –
eg, Golden Bear Hotel is an example of HHAP funding, which can be used for purchase and conversion of existing property and for services, is housing for the homeless and includes services. This hotel is a permanent housing option; people can stay there or could be transferred to different housing.
Dormitory at the old Alameda College of the Arts – converted to housing for unhoused seniors and includes services
Another project is MacArthur hotel.
Assemblymember Buffy Wicks
I see legislative and my personal priorities as one and the same. I have 25 bills, but housing is my #1. I’m chair of the housing committee.
I plan to spend the next two years working on the biggest nut to crack: how to have ongoing funding for affordable housing. We will never have housing stability if the State doesn’t invest via the budget. We got rid of the redevelopment agencies, which has had a big financial impact.
I have a $6 billion ask for this year. I’m trying to figure out how to secure $100 billion over a much longer period of time, so that we can solve this problem.
Among the aspects of the problem I’m looking at are: how do we have more rentals? How do we build more middle-income housing for teachers and nurses, for example, who can’t afford to live in the communities where they work?
We have to fund affordable housing. Voters expect us to make progress.
Overall climate policy is also very important, including the equity issues. Low-income communities will be harder hit. We’ve had fires, floods, rising sea levels – we’re just now understanding what we need to do. Housing and transportation are climate policies. We need to be more thoughtful about how these aspects are connected.
There’s also an issue around infill housing – I’ve questioned the Sierra Club on this. We need as many as 3.5 million additional homes in California. I want to build infill housing, not build into open spaces where freeways could be needed. Not all environmental agencies agree that infill is the solution.
LWV: AB 2295 identified 7000 properties, all infill, for education workforce housing. How can districts better understand and take advantage of opportunities? Are there any additional funding carrots? The California School Boards Association (CSBA) is using the program, but training alone will take a year. Board members and facilities staff would do more if they were more aware of this legislation.
BW: There are teachers in Oakland, born and raised and now teaching there who can’t afford to live there. We are looking for “missing middle” housing. Mia Bonta took over the pilot program, “Rooted in Oakland.” We need to expedite programs like this – they are part of the current conversation.
LWV: Could you explain HHAP’s current status and its relationship to the housing element?
BW: Funds are running out for HHAP. We have to do more. Are housing element plans a separate program from HHAP? Ilaf (Esuf, on Asm. Wicks’ staff) will get back to you on this.
(Note: Oakland’s housing element was approved last week.)
Comments